Reviewers
Dr. Eng. Muhammad Kunta Biddinika, S.T., M.Eng.
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Email : [email protected] | Scopus | ORCID | Google Scholar | Sinta
Wakhyu Dwiono
Universitas 'Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
Email : [email protected] | Scopus | ORCID | Google Scholar | Sinta
Dr. Rusydi Umar, S.T., M.T
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Email : [email protected] | Scopus | ORCID | Google Scholar | Sinta
Winarno, S.Si., M.Eng.
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Email : [email protected] | Scopus | ORCID | Google Scholar | Sinta
Reviewer Internal:
Yusuf Wahyu Setiya Putra, S.Kom., M.Kom.
STMIK Bina Patria
Email: [email protected] | Scopus | ORCID | Google Scholar | Sinta
Muqorobin, S.Kom., M.Kom.
ITB AAS Indonesia
Email: [email protected]| Scopus | ORCID | Google Scholar | Sinta
Tifani Intan Solihati, S.Kom., M.T.I.
UNBAJA
Email: [email protected]| Scopus | ORCID | Google Scholar | Sinta
Fauzan Natsir, S.Kom., M.Kom.
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Email: [email protected]| Scopus | ORCID | Google Scholar | Sinta
Peer Reviewers Process
All manuscripts will be subject to editorial review and double blind peer reviews. The Journal editor does not reveal the reviewers credentials to the authors and vice-versa. So both parties are not aware of each other's identity. All indicators of identity such as names, affiliations, etc are removed.
Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. Reviewers will also be asked to indicate how interesting and significant the research is. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board.
Based on the reviewers comments, the editors will then accept or reject the papers with the following conditions: (1) Accept and publish, with or without editorial revisions, (2) Invite the authors to revise their manuscript and address specific concerns, (3) Reject the article outright, typically on grounds of lack of originality, insufficient conceptual advancements or major technical and/or interpretational problems. Any changes made to the original manuscript will be clearly stated for the authors to review.
The authors should carefully examine sentence structure, the completeness and accuracy of the text, references, tables, and graphic contents of the revised manuscript. The Editor-in-Chief will have the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of manuscripts. The Editorial Board reserves the right to edit articles on all aspects of style, format, and clarity. Manuscripts with excessive errors in any aspect, i.e. spelling or punctuation, will be returned to authors for revision before resubmission or may be rejected entirely.